By Melvin J. Dubnick
Public responsibility is a trademark of contemporary democratic governance and the basis of the preferred functionality administration flow. Democracy is simply an empty workout if these in strength can't be held in charge in public for his or her acts and omissions, for his or her judgements, their rules, and their expenditures.
This booklet deals a finely certain and richly proficient attention of responsibility in either govt and the modern global of governance. Twenty-five top specialists conceal various facets of the responsibility move, together with a number of and competing accountabilities, measuring responsibility, responsibility and democratic legitimacy, and responsibility and knowledge expertise, and practice them to governments, quasi-governments, non-government firms, governance enterprises, and voluntary enterprises. jointly they supply the main accomplished attention of responsibility at the moment to be had, with a mix of theoretical, empirical, and utilized approaches.
Read Online or Download Accountable Governance. Problems and Promises PDF
Best public affairs books
This article offers an research of the EPA enforcement of the fresh Water Act and its amendments. The publication makes use of large EPA information, together with a survey of the EPA and kingdom point environmental officers, to ascertain enforcement from the viewpoint of the enforcement team of workers.
In 2012, the ERASMUS programme celebrated its twenty fifth anniversary. As one of many best-known tasks of the european, it has already enabled nearly 3 million scholars to spend part of their stories overseas. yet ERASMUS is greater than only a basic educational alternate programme: designed to give a contribution to the production of a «People’s Europe», it has develop into a profitable political tool for shaping generations of eu scholars.
This publication presents infrequent insights into the character of up to date, technologically-facilitated govt. Its multidisciplinary method demonstrates that info know-how is greater than a device for politicians and policy-makers. E-government has reconfigured public management, coverage, energy and citizenship.
Via compelling and insightful research of the Russian case, this ebook explores the position that social welfare performs in regime transitions. It examines the function that gender and social welfare has performed in Russia's post-communist political evolution from Yeltsin's assumption of the presidency to Putin's go back for a 3rd time period as president in 2012
- The Politics of Black Empowerment: The Transformation of Black Activism in Urban America
- After Welfare: The Culture of Postindustrial Social Policy
- Defining Drugs: How Government Became the Arbiter of Pharmaceutical Fact
- Modern Organizations: Theory and Practice
- Accountable Governance. Problems and Promises
- Managing Emerging Risk: The Capstone of Preparedness
Extra info for Accountable Governance. Problems and Promises
They rather prefer, as was described earlier, to stick to the agenda that agencies have laid out for themselves. As a result, the content of their oversight is experienced as a “reinforcement of what we already do” (R89). Put another way, “The bandwidth of their advice is usually quite close to the plans that were already developed” (R90). Evaluation: Symbolic Accountability Rather than Loss of Control or Paralysis In the evaluation of the consequences of multiple accountability through the addition of accountability to boards, three possible negative situations were predicted.
These are issues that address departmental inquiries into the future of agencies, formal evaluations of the agency, and other issues in which politicians are involved (17 percent). In the fourth group are issues regarding the governance of the agencies, including issues about the management and administrative task divisions (also 17 percent). In addition to the above picture of the central issues treated by the different boards, respondents indicate that boards devote more time to the political-strategic issues than could be distilled from the minutes and agendas of their meetings.
This lead to a very clear conclusion: boards are reluctant to use their formal sanctions. The respondents indicated that sanctions hardly ever played an explicit role and that members of boards prefer to use informal methods such as persuasion or perhaps threats to steer agencies. Hood et al. (1999, 53) already noted that accountability forums prefer the use of lighter and informal sanctions above stronger and more formalized sanctions. However, the availability of stronger sanctions leaves forums the possibility to escalate, and actors and forums are fully aware of this possibility.